voicEd.ca has invited Canadian bloggers writing about education to post their “best” entry of 2012. This may a piece of writing to which they feel particularly attached, something that received some good response, or an entry that got others thinking in a different way. We’ll be featuring these pieces in this space over the next couple of weeks with the hopes that readers might find them to be a good review of where our thinking has taken us over the past year. Feel free to join in the conversation, or submit your own entry for posting!
The following blog entry is from Alberta’s Lori Cullen who blogs At the Principal’s Office
Rules, rules, rules, everyone knows the key to success in school is to follow the rules.
Unfortunately, this belief persists in many of todays classrooms and schools. Next time you are in a classroom take a look at the posted rules. Are they rules such as “no talking while the teacher is talking, stay in your desk during work time, raise your hand if you need help?” If so, I think these rules say a lot about the teacher, the work environment and the level of meaningful engaging tasks. They imply that the teacher is the only one who holds the knowledge, the teacher will give you great wisdom and knowledge if only you will listen and the work you undertake will be solitary and designed to measure how well you listen.
Why is it that some classrooms need these types of rules and some do not? For the teachers that do not post these types of rules what is the difference? How can they manage without them?
One answer to these questions is to take a look at the type of tasks the student is being asked to undertake. To analyze the planning and preparation the teacher has given to design tasks which result in high levels of student engagement.
Think of it this way, if a teacher designs tasks that engage the student in meaningful learning will the student be wandering around the classroom disrupting others, off task, doing any of the other million things teachers often complain about?
But just what goes into meaningful learning and task design that results in high levels of student engagement?
I would like to give credit to the amazing staff at Erin Wood School in Calgary AB who worked together yesterday to answer this question. When analyzing student engagement, and tasks that result in high levels of student engagement we were able to effectively answer the question, “What are the attributes of tasks that result in meaningful learning and high(er) levels of student engagement?”
Tasks resulting in higher levels of student engagement consist of these attributes:
- Meaningful or related to the student’s life or interests;
- Working together with peers;
- Incorporates games;
- Created by the student (authentic);
- Result in a piece of work the student is proud of and wants to share;
- Challenging (but not so challenging it is unattainable);
- Considers learning styles;
- Allows for student choice;
- Can be extended by students;
Tasks resulting in lower levels of student engagement consists of these attributes:
- Easy and quick to complete (requires low levels of thinking);
- Is teacher designed (such as a worksheet);
- Has right or wrong answers;
- Considers none or all of the attributes of high engaging tasks.
When considering student engagement and the types of tasks students are asked to complete, I wonder if students who are given tasks designed to be highly meaningful and engaging do teachers really need to post rules such as “stay in your desk during work time?” Do these such rules imply that you have just entered a classroom of low-engaging task design? In my opinion, teachers who strive to design meaningful tasks that engage students are more likely to post “Work hard and do your best, or Respect yourself and others.” on the walls of their classroom.
About: This post was originally published in February 2012 on Author Lori Cullen’s personal blog At The Principal’s Office . Since that time it has been viewed over 500o times. A companion post Are Those Kids Off Task Again is worth the read as well!
Lori has been an educator for 24 years with the past 9 years as an administrator with the Calgary Board of Education. She is a tireless advocate for student achievement and a school emphasizing belonging. She believes in educating the whole child, meeting them where they are when they come to school. She never gives up, in the face of challenges her favorite words are, “What will we do now?” She is constantly seeking improvement and better ways of teaching and learning. You can read more on her blog at www.attheprincipalsoffice.com Follow Lori on twitter at @lorilynnecullen


Enjoyed reading this and the insights Lori and her colleagues provided examining something so common we take for granted.
I might add the following:
- the fewer the rules the better, perhaps just one “We shall treat each other with respect.”
- class designs the rule or rules; in socials I used to have students design a “classroom constitution”
or a class contract.
Thanks
The two rules you have near the end of your post
work for me.
Thanks for the feedback and great thinking John! I appreciate your ideas!
Linking student engagement and class rules is brilliant. Give the students meaningful and challenging activities and eliminate the boredom factor which accounts for most of the disruptive behaviours.
One September morning I was holding my annual first day of school orientation for my Grade 6 class. When we got to the topic of class rules I asked, “Do we need to have rules for the classroom and if so what should they look like?” The usual litany of do’s and don’ts were suggested but one of the students, a boy named Carl, spoke up and said, “If we all agree that everybody in the class has rights and we all agree that those rights must be respected then we need to have only one rule. Respect the rights of others.” I truly believe that because the suggestion came from one of them and not from me, the kids bought into it and agreed to try for a month having just that one rule. October dawned and we still had only one classroom rule.
Congratulations to you and your staff for your insights into student engagement.
Thanks for the feedback Michael. Carl is wise beyond his years and good for you for following his lead and not making it your own agenda!